How to Automate Continuous SOC 2 Monitoring in Cloud Environments
Katie
Campisi
Nov 26, 2025
Security teams can waste half the year proving compliance instead of improving it. Traditional SOC 2 audits lock you into reactive cycles: chasing manual evidence, scrambling when auditors show up, pulling detection engineers off investigations to compile screenshots and exports.
In our recent webinar with AWS, Vanta, and Latacora, we showed how organizations have solved this. Companies like Docker and Cockroach Labs cut audit prep time by 90% while expanding security coverage by 3-5x. They did it by making their security infrastructure double as their compliance evidence store.
Choosing the Right Tools for SOC 2 Automation
SOC 2 automation tools continuously monitor controls, collect audit evidence, and track compliance requirements across cloud environments without human intervention.
When evaluating platforms, three capabilities matter:
Pre-mapped controls and framework coverage. Platforms like Vanta, Sprinto, and Drata map technical controls to SOC 2 requirements so you know exactly what evidence you need. Most companies pursuing SOC 2 today will need ISO 27001 or HIPAA within 18 months, so multi-framework support saves you from rebuilding your entire compliance stack later.
Real-time monitoring and detection. Your compliance platform needs continuous access to security data, not quarterly snapshots. Cloud-native SIEMs like Panther ingest logs from your entire tech stack: cloud infrastructure, SaaS applications, identity providers, and network telemetry. This means one system handles both threat detection and compliance monitoring.
Automated evidence collection at scale. Manual evidence gathering kills compliance programs. The best platforms connect directly to source systems and automatically pull logs, access records, configuration snapshots, and policy documentation. Vanta's 400+ pre-built integrations show what this looks like: evidence collection happens in the background while your team does actual security work.
Integration architecture matters as much as individual features. Cloud-native solutions with strong API support and AI-driven analytics scale better. John Brunot, an AWS GSCA Partner Solutions Architect, explains in the webinar that the shared responsibility model requires your tools to work seamlessly with cloud provider services like AWS Security Hub, CloudTrail, and Config. Without those connections, you're missing half your evidence.
Integrating Cloud and Security Systems for Continuous Monitoring
Continuous SOC 2 monitoring breaks without deep integrations between cloud platforms, security tools, and business applications. Manual evidence collection and point-in-time snapshots are what you get otherwise.
Start with cloud infrastructure monitoring across AWS, Azure, and GCP. AWS CloudTrail provides immutable audit trails of every API call and management console action. Config tracks resource configurations and relationships over time. Security Hub automatically aggregates findings and checks them against compliance frameworks. These native capabilities form the evidence base for multiple SOC 2 controls.
Add identity and access management integration with Okta or Azure AD. Your compliance platform needs visibility into user provisioning, authentication events, MFA enforcement, and access reviews. LVH, Latacora’s co-founder, demonstrates this in the webinar by combining identity logs with security monitoring to answer complex questions instantly, such as confirming that all GitHub runners use OAuth workload identities rather than static credentials.
CI/CD pipelines and code repositories like GitHub and GitLab provide evidence of change management controls. Your automation platform should track who made changes, when, and whether they followed approval workflows. Auditors always ask about the separation of duties and configuration drift.
SaaS application monitoring completes the picture. Google Workspace, Slack, Salesforce, and hundreds of other tools generate security-relevant events that map to SOC 2 requirements. Multi-cloud monitoring across these systems creates comprehensive automated compliance coverage.
The integration architecture:
System Layer | Components | Compliance Value |
Cloud Infrastructure | AWS, Azure, GCP | Resource configurations, API activity, security posture |
Identity & Access | Okta, Azure AD | Authentication, authorization, and access reviews |
CI/CD & Code | GitHub, GitLab | Change management, code security, and approvals |
SaaS Applications | Google Workspace, Slack, Salesforce | User activity, data access, and collaboration security |
Security Monitoring | Panther, Security Hub | Threat detection, alert correlation, and incident response |
Mike Olsen, Panther’s Director of Partner Solutions Engineering, explains how Docker achieved triple the log coverage while streamlining SOC 2 compliance. When your security data lake becomes your compliance evidence store, you eliminate duplicate systems and manual handoffs.
Setting Up Continuous Compliance Monitoring Workflows
Continuous control monitoring means automated, ongoing validation that security and compliance controls are operating correctly. Issues are identified as soon as they arise, rather than during quarterly reviews.

Here's how to establish continuous SOC 2 compliance:
Define policies and map to controls. Document each SOC 2 requirement and identify the technical controls that satisfy it. Modern platforms provide pre-built mappings, but you need to customize them for your specific environment and claims.
Configure automated control checks. Set up continuous validation for each control. Check that MFA is enforced, S3 buckets aren't publicly accessible, and log retention meets requirements. These checks should run continuously, not weekly or monthly.
Enable real-time alerting on drift. Configure notifications when controls fail or configurations change. SOC 2 automation solutions provide 24/7 dashboards that display compliance status and issue instant alerts for violations. Gavin Matthews, a Group Product Manager at Vanta, explains how this prevents the scramble during audit season when you discover months of missing evidence.
Implement self-healing where possible. Some platforms automatically remediate common issues, such as closing security groups or rotating credentials. This reduces mean time to remediation while maintaining an audit trail of the automated response.
Maintain continuous audit trails. Every check, alert, and remediation gets logged with timestamps and context. Your SIEM becomes your compliance evidence store, providing queryable, immutable records of control effectiveness over time.
Gartner predicts that by 2026, 70% of enterprises will have integrated compliance as code into their DevOps toolchains, reducing risk management and improving lead time by at least 15% CockroachDB cut prep time by 90% after implementing this workflow with Panther and Vanta, moving from 30 days of log retention and scrambling during audits to one year of hot storage and continuous readiness.
LVH from Latacora demonstrated how this workflow enables real-time answers to auditor questions. When asked to prove that GitHub runners use OAuth workload identities, the answer came from querying Tailscale audit logs in seconds, rather than days of manual evidence gathering.
Automating Evidence Collection and Audit Readiness
Automated evidence collection means programmatically gathering compliance artifacts—such as logs, access reviews, policy documentation, and configuration snapshots—from cloud systems without manual effort.
Modern SOC 2 automation connects directly to source systems rather than relying on periodic exports or screenshots. When Vanta integrates with AWS, it continuously validates that security groups are configured correctly, that IAM policies follow the principle of least privilege, and that CloudTrail logging is enabled across all regions. No snapshots.
How automated evidence collection works:
Direct API integration pulls live data. Automation platforms query APIs continuously instead of asking humans to generate reports. This includes user lists from identity providers, configuration states from cloud platforms, and activity logs from SaaS applications.
Evidence mapping to specific controls. Each piece of evidence automatically links to relevant SOC 2 controls. A CloudTrail log showing MFA enforcement maps to access control requirements. Config snapshots showing encryption settings map to data protection controls.
Unified dashboards provide real-time visibility. Compliance teams see a single view showing which controls are validated, which need attention, and which evidence is ready for auditors. Vanta's platform provides an always-current compliance picture rather than point-in-time reports.
Auditor workspaces enable self-service access. The most sophisticated platforms create secure spaces where auditors can review evidence directly, export reports, and track remediation. This eliminates the back-and-forth that typically adds weeks to audit timelines.
Pre-built framework mappings accelerate this further. When you add a new integration, it automatically begins collecting evidence for multiple standards: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR. Multi-framework support becomes critical as your compliance requirements expand.
Panther's role in this ecosystem: By ingesting 100% of your security logs into a cloud-native data lake, it creates a comprehensive, queryable evidence store. Mike Olsen noted that Docker moved from making compromises about which logs to ingest to bringing in their full tech stack—3x the coverage—while reducing costs and dramatically cutting audit prep time.
Correlating Security Events with SOC 2 Controls
The power of modern compliance automation shows up when you connect security incidents directly to SOC 2 requirements. This correlation proves your controls work and provides the detailed evidence auditors demand.
Centralized log analysis via SIEM platforms enables organizations to flag, investigate, and remediate SOC 2 policy violations in real time. Cloud-native SIEMs like Panther serve both security and compliance needs simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate systems.
The process for mapping security events to compliance controls:
1. Ingest comprehensive security telemetry. Your SIEM must collect logs from cloud infrastructure (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Activity Logs), identity systems (Okta, Azure AD), applications (GitHub, Slack), and security tools (EDR, firewalls). Incomplete data means gaps in both threat detection and compliance evidence.
2. Build detections mapped to controls. Write detection rules that identify security threats and compliance violations. A detection for "S3 bucket made public" satisfies security monitoring while providing evidence for data protection controls. Panther's detection-as-code approach using Python makes these rules maintainable and version-controlled, which is another audit win.
3. Create compliance-aware alert routing. Tag alerts with relevant SOC 2 controls so incidents automatically generate compliance documentation. When a failed login detection fires, it proves your monitoring control is working. When you remediate the issue, that action becomes evidence of your incident response process.
4. Establish automated incident correlation. Connect related events across systems to show how attacks progress and how your controls responded. LVH from Latacora demonstrated this in our webinar by querying Tailscale audit logs, OSQuery results, and other sources simultaneously to prove specific security configurations across the fleet.
5. Maintain queryable audit trails. Every detection, alert, investigation, and response gets logged with full context. This creates the immutable evidence trail auditors need to verify control effectiveness over time. Panther's data lake architecture provides queryable logs with timestamps, user actions, and system responses preserved indefinitely.
When an auditor asks, "How do you detect unauthorized access attempts?" you show them the actual detections, alert volumes, investigation workflows, and remediation timelines. Not just a policy document claiming you do these things.
Docker's security team achieved an 85% reduction in false positives by using Panther's programmable detection engine while maintaining comprehensive SOC 2 evidence, delivering improved security and compliance from the same platform.
As AI-powered alert triage becomes standard in modern SIEMs, auditability becomes critical for compliance. AI that operates as a black box creates problems during audits; you can't prove why alerts were prioritized or dismissed. Panther's AI triage maintains a complete audit trail of every decision: which signals it analyzed, what context it considered, and why it reached each conclusion. This transparency means AI-assisted investigations generate the same queryable, timestamped evidence that auditors require, just faster.
Tracking Key Metrics for Continuous Compliance Monitoring
Continuous compliance monitoring metrics quantify your program's effectiveness and provide the data-driven story auditors and executives need to see.
Essential metrics for SOC 2 continuous monitoring:
Control coverage and monitoring frequency
Percentage of SOC 2 controls with automated monitoring (target: 90%+)
Number of controls checked continuously vs. periodically
Coverage gaps requiring manual validation
Track this in your compliance dashboard. As you expand automation, this percentage should climb. Each new integration should increase your automated coverage.
Detection and remediation performance
Mean time to detect (MTTD) compliance drift
Mean time to remediate (MTTR) control failures
Number of control failures detected per month
Percentage resolved within SLA
These metrics prove your controls aren't just documented but effective. When CockroachDB moved from 30-day to 1-year log retention with Panther, they could suddenly measure and improve these timelines using complete historical data.
Evidence collection efficiency
Volume of evidence collected programmatically vs. manually
Time spent on evidence gathering (hours per audit)
Evidence collection failures or gaps
Auditor questions requiring additional manual effort
Modern teams should see 80-90% of evidence collected automatically. If you're still spending weeks gathering screenshots and exports, your automation isn't working.
Audit readiness indicators
Percentage of controls currently compliant
Number of outstanding remediation items
Days since last control failure
Estimated time to audit readiness
Real-time dashboards showing these metrics eliminate the quarterly panic of "Are we ready for the auditor?" You know your status every day.
Present these metrics in visual formats, such as dashboards, trend lines, and comparison charts. Executives want to see improvement over time. Auditors want evidence that your monitoring is continuous and effective. These metrics tell both stories.
Gavin Matthews from Vanta emphasized that tracking metrics demonstrates compliance health, enables continuous improvement, and builds stakeholder confidence. The goal isn't just passing audits but proving your security program is mature, measurable, and constantly evolving.
Best Practices for Audit Trail Retention and Compliance
An audit trail is a chronological record of system activities—user actions, configuration changes, and access events—that is essential for compliance investigations and for demonstrating control effectiveness over time.
Robust audit trail management requires following these practices:
Store logs centrally with encryption. Don't scatter audit data across individual systems with varying retention policies, or queries become impossible. A centralized security data lake provides unified access while maintaining encryption at rest and in transit. Panther's architecture delivers cost-effective, encrypted storage with Snowflake or Databricks for high-performance querying.
Automate retention schedules aligned with requirements. SOC 2 Type II audits typically require 12-24 months of historical data. Configure automatic retention in your SIEM and compliance platform to maintain this window without manual intervention. Mike Olsen highlighted how Cockroach Labs went from 30 days of retention (due to legacy SIEM cost constraints) to one year of hot storage with Panther, meeting compliance requirements while improving security investigations.
Implement granular access controls. Audit trail data is sensitive because it shows who did what and when. Restrict access to authorized personnel only, log all queries against audit data, and maintain separation of duties. Your compliance platform should make it easy for auditors to access evidence while preventing unauthorized viewing or modification.
Ensure immutability and tamper-proofing. Audit trails lose their value if they can be altered. Use write-once-read-many (WORM) storage where appropriate, maintain cryptographic verification of log integrity, and configure alerts for any attempts to modify historical data. AWS CloudTrail's integration with S3 Object Lock provides this capability natively.
Automate regular backup and disaster recovery. Audit trails must survive system failures, security incidents, or data center outages. Implement automatic replication across regions, regularly test restoration procedures, and document your backup architecture for auditors.
Maintain complete context for investigations. Each audit trail entry should include sufficient detail for forensic analysis: user identity, source IP address, timestamp, action taken, affected resources, and outcome. Rich context turns audit trails from compliance checkboxes into valuable security intelligence.
Automating log collection and retention with a modern SIEM or compliance platform enhances security while minimizing mean time to respond. When LVH from Latacora demonstrates live queries during the webinar, the speed comes from having comprehensive, queryable data instantly available, rather than scrambling to reconstruct events from scattered logs.
John Brunot from AWS emphasizes that proper audit trail management is fundamental to the shared responsibility model. AWS provides the infrastructure-level logging capabilities. You're responsible for collecting, retaining, and analyzing that data in accordance with your compliance requirements. Cloud-native tools make this dramatically easier and more cost-effective than legacy approaches.
Demonstrating Continuous Monitoring to Auditors
Proving continuous monitoring to auditors means showing the working system in real time, not just making claims.
Prepare comprehensive, always-current dashboards. Your compliance platform should maintain real-time views of control status, evidence collection, and historical performance. When auditors review your program, they see live data instead of stale reports from weeks ago. Vanta's dashboard approach shows which controls are validated, when they were last checked, and any outstanding issues.
Provide exportable, detailed reports on demand. Auditors need the ability to drill into specifics. Your platform should generate detailed control activity reports that show every check performed, every piece of evidence collected, and every remediation completed, with timestamps and context. These reports should be available instantly, not after days of data gathering.
Create secure auditor workspaces. The most efficient audit processes give auditors self-service access to evidence within your compliance platform. They can review documentation, query data, export reports, and track remediation progress without constant back-and-forth with your team. This transparency accelerates the audit while reducing your team's burden.
Show the complete compliance story, not point-in-time snapshots. Traditional audits rely on sampling specific dates or periods. Continuous monitoring enables you to demonstrate control effectiveness across the entire audit period. LVH from Latacora demonstrates this in our webinar by answering complex questions about Tailscale authentication and OSQuery compliance, querying months of historical data in seconds.
Demonstrate detection and response workflows live. Don't just claim you have incident response processes. Walk auditors through actual security alerts, investigation steps, and remediation actions, all logged in your SIEM. This proves your controls aren't just documented but operational.
Maintain complete audit trails of all system changes. When auditors ask about configuration changes, access modifications, or policy updates, you should be able to provide a complete timeline: who made the change, when, which approval process was followed, and which systems were affected.
The workflow for proving continuous monitoring:
Auditor requests evidence for a specific control
Navigate to the control in the compliance platform
Show real-time status and historical validation data
Drill into underlying evidence (logs, screenshots, configurations)
Export a detailed report with a complete audit trail
Address any gaps or questions with live queries against your SIEM
Real-time auditor access dramatically streamlines the review process. Instead of weeks of evidence requests and responses, auditors can verify control effectiveness immediately. This approach transforms the audit from an adversarial process into a collaborative verification.
“With Panther and Vanta monitoring critical resources in cloud tools like AWS, audits are no longer scrambles to grab screenshots. Instead, we can prove continuous compliance in a way that auditors can easily understand.”
Nathan Hunstad, Director Of Security At Vanta
Automation tools facilitate maintaining and demonstrating a complete, real-time compliance story rather than relying on point-in-time screenshots or outdated documentation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What aspects of SOC 2 monitoring can be automated?
SOC 2 automation platforms can continuously monitor controls, collect evidence, perform risk assessments, manage policies, and conduct user access reviews. Modern platforms automate 80-90% of compliance tasks, leaving security teams to focus on exceptions and strategic improvements rather than routine evidence gathering.
How often should continuous monitoring checks occur?
With automation, monitoring is performed 24/7 in real time rather than relying on manual checks scheduled every one to two weeks. Control validation happens continuously. Configuration drift is detected within minutes, not discovered during quarterly reviews.
How can small teams manage ongoing SOC 2 compliance?
Small teams can leverage automated platforms and built-in integrations to minimize manual tasks, streamline evidence collection, and manage compliance with clear dashboards and workflows. Companies like Docker achieved 3x log coverage while cutting false positives by 85%,1 proving that the right tools make comprehensive compliance achievable even with limited resources.
What are the benefits of automating SOC 2 compliance monitoring?
Automation improves visibility into compliance controls, reduces operational friction, strengthens audit readiness, and enables organizations to detect and remediate issues quickly. Beyond the efficiency gains, automation provides better security outcomes. You're monitoring more comprehensively, responding faster to threats, and maintaining evidence that proves your controls work. Cockroach Lab's 90% reduction in audit prep time demonstrates the operational impact.
How is AI shaping the future of SOC 2 continuous monitoring?
AI-driven tools now provide real-time detection, early anomaly warning, predictive attack detection based on historical data, and faster responses for SOC 2 compliance. Panther's AI-powered alert triage, for example, automatically analyzes security events to distinguish genuine threats from false positives.
The key to compliance is auditability. AI that functions as a black box creates audit risk—you can't explain why certain alerts were prioritized or dismissed. Effective AI for compliance maintains complete decision trails: what data it analyzed, what patterns it identified, and why it reached each conclusion. This transparency ensures AI-assisted triage generates the same immutable evidence auditors require, while dramatically reducing the time security teams spend on false positives.
Building Continuous Compliance at Scale
The traditional compliance model doesn't scale with modern cloud environments. When you're deploying infrastructure as code, managing multi-cloud environments, and releasing software continuously, your compliance program must keep pace.
The architecture demonstrated in our webinar combines cloud-native security monitoring (Panther), automated compliance platforms (Vanta), cloud provider security services (AWS), and expert guidance (Latacora). This represents the new standard for SOC 2 compliance. Embedding compliance into your security operations so thoroughly that audit readiness becomes a natural outcome of doing security well.
Companies achieving this transformation report dramatic improvements: 90% reductions in audit prep time, 3-5x increases in security coverage, 85% reductions in false-positive alerts, and moving from days or weeks of hot log retention to a year or more. These are fundamental shifts in how security and compliance teams operate.
The path forward: centralize your security data in a cloud-native platform, automate evidence collection through deep integrations, maintain continuous control validation, and provide real-time visibility to auditors and stakeholders. The technology exists today. The question is whether your organization will continue the quarterly scramble or join the teams already operating with continuous compliance.
Ready to see how this works in practice? Watch the full webinar for live demonstrations and detailed technical insights from Panther, AWS, Vanta, and Latacora on building for continuous compliance in cloud environments.
Recommended Resources
Ready for less noise
and more control?
See Panther in action. Book a demo today.




